Re: haha
the title takes it all,
your naked photo shoots will be distributed globally
haha
will you accept the offer? y?
ME:
yesh, ahaha
i have nothing to hide off
and im wild, definetely wild
hahahaha
i
[quote=royalroa]they have one narrow view and it's the pornographic type nudity as implied by their concern about their reputation. after all, scandals are the new trend especially in the philippines. but as i said, porno-type nude photos are not the only type.[/quote]
Ok, i get your point of views. You are right when you say that porno type nude photos are not the only type. I agree to that. I have no way of arguing on your statement above because i myself agree. However, [quote=royalroa]nude art? what's so degrading about that?[/quote]
...what is being degraded, i think, in shooting a nude photo although the privates are intentionally hide or the camera is [i]strategically positioned[/i] as you coined it is the sacredness of the human person. The man in the picture became the object of happiness or lust for people who do not have a broad perception or have narrow views on the art of photography. The picture loses its purpose. Nowadays, people do not acknowledge anymore the sense of art. What they look only is the body which gives them the pleasure, the privates which makes them horny, the face, etc. It would have been a great photo supposedly if only people know how beautiful it was. But let's have a reality check, generally people look at it now as a sex fantasy material rather than as an art. For example, those FHMs, playboy, and other magazines featuring the same as those mentioned a while ago. Those celebs, some if not all, who have been in the cover shoot do it for the sake of their career, hence, for the sake of money.
@royalroa, I am impressed in our exchanging and arguing of views. It is very substantial in content.
Btw, why not argue on some other topics, right? It would be more challenging. And hopefully an enjoying one.