Pages: 1
The first film has been in theaters for a little over 24 hours now, but Summit Entertainment hasn't wasted any time in officially announcing the follow up to Twilight (which took in a whopping $35 million on Friday alone), based on the second book in the series, New Moon. Here's the press release Cinematical just received:
[i]
"Summit Entertainment announced today that the studio is officially moving forward with the production of NEW MOON, the second installment of its filmed franchise TWILIGHT, the action-packed, modern day vampire love story. The movie will be based on the second novel in author Stephenie Meyer's Twilight series titled, New Moon. The first movie in the TWILIGHT franchise, the self-titled TWILIGHT, arrived in theaters this weekend to sold-out showings.
Stephenie Meyer stated, "I don't think any other author has had a more positive experience with the makers of her movie adaptation than I have had with Summit Entertainment. I'm thrilled to have the chance to work with them again on NEW MOON."[/i]
Starring Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart, TWILIGHT tells the story of 17-year-old Bella Swan who moves to the small town of Forks, Washington to live with her father, and becomes drawn to Edward Cullen, a pale, mysterious classmate who seems determined to push her away. But neither can deny the attraction that pulls them together...even when Edward confides that he and his family are vampires. Their unorthodox romance puts her in physical danger when Edward's nemesis comes to town and sets his sights on Bella."
So, Twilight fans, what would you like to see with New Moon?
[b]As for the rumours:[/b]
[spoiler]Here's a question: Should any studio greenlight a sequel based on advanced buzz and before the original even hits theaters? Sure, if you're a fan of the Twilight novels, I suspect you'd want the studio to greenlight, like, a billion Twilight sequels, like, right this second -- but wouldn't it be a risky move? Nikki Finke over at Deadline Hollywood claims Summit's already prepping the sequel (New Moon), though that's about as far as she goes with it. Finke, however, does state the obvious: that even though the first Twilight film isn't due out until November 21, the latest trailer was viewed over 3.5 million times in 48 hours, the Twilight soundtrack has already hit the Top 5 Best-Selling Albums on Amazon (despite the fact that it doesn't come out until November 4th) and the merchandise for this sucker rivals that of the boy wizard, Harry Potter.
Okay, so obviously there's an audience for not one film, but two -- yet what if that audience doesn't like the first installment? Is that even possible? Is this the sort of film fans will love no matter what the final product looks like? And do you really take a chance greenlighting a sequel with a film whose audience is not comprised of the oh-so-lucrative teen male population. Are teen and pre-teen girls (and their moms) enough to carry this entire franchise?
And for you Twilight fans out there: While early, is there anything different you'd like to see from the sequel?[/spoiler]
)
super excited to watch twilight.
then NEW MOON. can't wait!
if you wanted to read the news about it, you could go here
http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1599994/story.jhtml
[/align]
http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles�tory.jhtml[/quote]
Thanks for info
but still support the twilight
haha
to the topic:
they can still try it,
and wait for the reaction of the audience
sometimes making risks is fun
and entertaining
maybe it will be a click.
and there are millions of fans in the world
waiting for the twilight movies
uhm,
its better to have the ones who made the twilight movie first
to produce the other sequel to have the twilight
as their trademark movie
hehe
[/quote]
I agree with her
[/b]
[/color]
[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/35k8ljm.jpg[/img][/align]
[/quote]
yea, meee too!! cant hardly wait for the [i]breaking dawn[/i]


Pages: 1