• ARCHIVES 
  • » [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

Pages: 1

[quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

losher29
» FTalkElite
FTalk Level: zero
5917
0
1969-12-31

[quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

[quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the laughing stock of the film industry. You might be thinking: Why did they make a sequel? And so is everyone else. It was directed by Shane Van Dyke and stars Bruce Davison, Brooke Burns, Shane Van Dyke, Marie Westbrook and Gerald Webb. Not surprisingly, Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet didn’t sign up for the sequel, nor did James Cameron. The film’s plot revolves around a modern luxury liner being launched on the 100th anniversary of the original voyage. And the ‘Titanic 2’ faces the same fate as its predecessor when a tsunami hurls an iceberg into the ship, leading passengers to fight for their lives. Take a look at the Titanic 2 trailer below to see the world’s most pointless sequel.[/quote] [align=center][url=http://www.metro.co.uk/film/836534-titanic-2-trailer-revealed-and-it-s-not-a-joke][size=5][b]SEE THE TRAILER HERE[/b][/size][/url] :-_-:[/align]
yanndicecaedy
» FTalkAddict
FTalk Level: zero
361
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

This is ridiculous. Haha. Really pointless and nonsense. I mean, why would they make such a sequel when it already on the real Titanic with Jack and Rose? And Titanic really was a nice movie and no other Titanic(s) would ever be better than it.
cutest08
» FTalkWhiz
FTalk Level: zero
2918
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

^i agree. And why do they make a sequel, this time. Why didnt that time that 2 years or 3 years after the Titanic was watched by the people. Gadd.
losher29
» FTalkElite
FTalk Level: zero
5917
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

[b]^[/b] [b]ARE YOU KIDDING ME?[/b] There [b]SHOULD NEVER [/b]be a Titanic sequel in the first place, I seriously think that all these remakes is getting ridiculous as time goes by, I was fine with Wonderland & Karate Kid, But what the fuck? Titanic? That's messed up, Leave titanic alone. I know it's a different Production, and the ship is named "Titanic II" (which is really idiotic btw) They said it's a tsunami hurls a god damn ice berg onto the ship so it eventually sinks, That's like the dumbest piece of crap i've ever heard, Do they realize that's it's the same fucking climax with the original movie? (well except the whole tsunami thing) If they named the movie/ship differently, It wouldn't sound as bad, Never mess with Cameron's perfection. I bet when this comes out, people would be laughing their arses off What I don't understand is ._______. AHHH bleh this is so pointless, The directors are stupid enough trying to top the all time best movie Here's the thing, There's a ship and it sinks. summarized. [b]WHY WASTE YOUR BUDGET WITH THAT?[/b] can't they think of another concept for a movie? why titanic -__- Just because Titanic is popular doesn't mean People are gonna want to see this movie, It looks fucking hideous

Last edited by losher29 (2010-08-02 02:37:12)

yanndicecaedy
» FTalkAddict
FTalk Level: zero
361
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

[quote=losher29;#3661272;1280730614]If they named the movie/ship differently, It wouldn't sound as bad, Never mess with Cameron's perfection. I bet when this comes out, people would be laughing their arses off[/quote] I agree with this. [quote=losher29;#3661272;1280730614]Here's the thing, There's a ship and it sinks. summarized. WHY WASTE YOUR BUDGET WITH THAT? can't they think of another concept for a movie? why titanic -__-[/quote] Agree. They just repeated the same movie and concept with only different characters. People would just waste their money watching a movie that's not worth watching.
strikerno14
» FTalker
FTalk Level: zero
288
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

lol you know why they should never make another titanic sequel? cause titanic already sank
losher29
» FTalkElite
FTalk Level: zero
5917
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

[quote=strikerno14;#3661321;1280736856]you know why they should never make another titanic sequel? cause titanic already sank[/quote] theres ONLY ONE titanic and yeah already sank -___- i dont know how stupid these producers are for building another ship and naming it titanic II .______. [quote=yanndicecaedy;#3661318;1280736240]Agree. They just repeated the same movie and concept with only different characters. People would just waste their money watching a movie that's not worth watching.[/quote] it's unfcknbelieveable .___. way too pointless too predictable too

Last edited by losher29 (2010-08-02 05:41:07)

jamessss:b
» SuperFTalker
FTalk Level: zero
8837
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

Chill guy. It wasn't meant for a sequel of the first one. K? :lol3:
losher29
» FTalkElite
FTalk Level: zero
5917
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

[quote=jamessss:b;#3661469;1280756950]Chill guy. It wasn't meant for a sequel of the first one. K? :lol3:[/quote] We all know it isn't, [b]LOL[/b]. it's a different production but you just can't help but react cause it's associated with the original movie, [b]ESPECIALLY[/b] WHEN IT'S TITLED TITANIC [b]II[/b], and you can't chill when some low budget movie is trying to ruin titanic, no what matter what, people would still think it's the sequel cause of the name, and the story, even they know it isn't done by cameron
jamessss:b
» SuperFTalker
FTalk Level: zero
8837
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

it was because they are trying to fool some stupid people who actually thought that this direct to dvd movie is a sequel to the one of the highest grossing movie of all the time, but then not all the people will buy this sht. :lol3:
strikerno14
» FTalker
FTalk Level: zero
288
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

[quote=jamessss:b;#3661634;1280761989]it was because they are trying to fool some stupid people who actually thought that this direct to dvd movie is a sequel to the one of the highest grossing movie of all the time, but then not all the people will buy this sht. :lol3:[/quote] that's why it's stupid to make another one... lol
losher29
» FTalkElite
FTalk Level: zero
5917
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

[quote=jamessss:b;#3661634;1280761989]it was because they are trying to fool some stupid people who actually thought that this direct to dvd movie is a sequel to the one of the highest grossing movie of all the time, but then not all the people will buy this sht. :lol3:[/quote] Actually no, they're using Titanic's popularity to get the crowd, they don't care if people think if it's the sequel or not, they just want to make money outta it Btw there's other movies about titanic, but the 1997 one was the best I swear if this movie wasn't named titanic II, it wouldn't sound as stupid

Last edited by losher29 (2010-08-04 00:14:45)

yhanikz
» FTalkWhiz
FTalk Level: zero
3026
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

[i]Eww.[/i] Titanic [i]II[/i] they would totally get bankrupt after this film. :xixi: Titanic's better of not having a sequel.
harlequin0666
» FTalkAddict
FTalk Level: zero
567
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

Why make a sequel when Titanic I is already enough? I bet if they ever do, people wouldn't like it. But still, Titanic's like, the best movie of all time. For me, though.
yh3t
» FTalkWhiz
FTalk Level: zero
2750
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

This is so funny to me :xixi:
SvperGirl
» FTalker
FTalk Level: zero
257
0
1969-12-31

Re: [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

They truly had lost their minds. People nowadays.. they'll just go and do things without even thinking about it. If they wanted to make a sequel, they should've done it years ago. Seriously.
  • ARCHIVES 
  • » [quote][img]http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2010/07/29/article-1280410483876-0A9DD208000005DC-766047_636x300.jpg[/img] So don’t be surprised that the promotional trailer for Titanic 2 has become the lau

Pages: 1

Board footer

© 2025 F Talk

Current time is 23:34

[ 10 queries - 0.025 second ]
Privacy Policy