Pages: 1
[/align]
Last edited by losher29 (2010-08-02 02:37:12)
Last edited by losher29 (2010-08-02 05:41:07)
[/quote]
We all know it isn't, [b]LOL[/b]. it's a different production but you just can't help but react cause it's associated with the original movie, [b]ESPECIALLY[/b] WHEN IT'S TITLED TITANIC [b]II[/b], and you can't chill when some low budget movie is trying to ruin titanic, no what matter what, people would still think it's the sequel cause of the name, and the story, even they know it isn't done by cameron
[/quote]
that's why it's stupid to make another one... lol
[/quote]
Actually no, they're using Titanic's popularity to get the crowd, they don't care if people think if it's the sequel or not, they just want to make money outta it
Btw there's other movies about titanic, but the 1997 one was the best
I swear if this movie wasn't named titanic II, it wouldn't sound as stupid
Last edited by losher29 (2010-08-04 00:14:45)
Titanic's better of not having a sequel.
Pages: 1