[quote=As cicatrizes]ernz_love wrote: well its not complaining.. complain and reactions are deferent wakoko... some do not actually understand the difference between the two., i am positive that if such section will be granted, flames will surely occur. Not all members are as respectful as some., because some members would go farther as to insult members/moderators. that is the scenario that i predict. also, if someone will moderate that section,it's not called a freedom board.,wkokokokkk~~ well, we all have different views. I neither agree nor disagree.,im still weighing the pros and cons.[/quote] well lets wait for the admin for his judgment whether he will approved this suggestion or not... and nor i, i respect the suggestion, felling, views of others... off topic.. [spoiler]all i can say is that your ava is soo cute.. nyahahah... and merry x mass and happy new year to all wakoko.. peace be with you... [/spoiler]

Last edited by ernz_love (2008-12-20 08:59:58)

[quote=As cicatrizes]also, if someone will moderate that section,it's not called a freedom board.,wkokokokkk~~ well, we all have different views. I neither agree nor disagree.,im still weighing the pros and cons.[/quote] like this one lol.. make sense ...

It seems someone is misinterpreted my words here. Let me elaborate it to you. But before anything else. Learn how to comprehend about others opinion first before posting your reactions. [quote=xelcris]i see.. so even if u knew that a mod is acting stupid.. u wont do anything about that? hw silly is dat hahahah so dts y. some mods are bigheaded.. sorry for this.. ive just noticed it..[/quote] As if you know what are our capabilities. Then tell me, Asides from giving a comments to our co-moderators on our Moderators corner and confronting them about the problems. What should we do then?. Curse them?. Ban them?. Just so you know. We don't have the power to access our co-moderators panel, We can only talk and confront them. How can we ban them? curse them?. Like I said, PM admin if you want them to be punish because we cant do anything about it asides from confronting them. You know better than that?. I would love to hear that just PM me. Still don't get the point?. I will elaborate it more to you just PM me so we will not go too much off topic here. Probably this is the last. *No puns intended. [quote=xelcris]im glad u admit that ur not perfect.. i too am not perfect...[/quote] Yep. I admit it. and without evil laugh [hr][hr][hr] [b] ernz_love[/b] Oh OK. Sorry about that, See. I'm not perfect . OK here [quote=portuniecho]You should have reported it instead of waiting for this suggestion to arise. Click the Report button now and provide the reason and don't wait for this suggestion to be implemented if that is only your [b]REACTIONS[/b]. You know Moderators is not always right. We admit it [s]don't worry[/s] . Good Day.[/quote] How about that?. Now Let me ask you. What's the difference if you will react your reaction NOW on the day [sub](where this suggestion already implemented)[/sub] you reacted your reaction regarding your threads that has been moved?. If you reported it now, then your reaction will be taking a solution now. That's the point. Its not about complains and reactions differences matters wakoko. Its about what would be the difference on the said scenario. Its the same, It will be taking actions about your so called "reactions". Now what I'm trying to point out is. A kinds of matters like your REACTIONS is not really need to be discuss instead reporting it so it will be solve right away. Right?. Btw. No Puns intended. As a Moderator. I am concerned about your reaction about your thread because maybe or for sure I'm the Moderator who moved your threads in different topic even if its in the right thread already. nyay PM me also and lets talk about this about your thread or if you have something to say, so we will not go too much off topic here. Probably this is the last. [hr][hr][hr] Sorry about the Off topic. @topic. Now I'm seeing pros and cons about this suggestion like some members don't know how to comprehend on what's really pointing out before they post their opinion. And thinking they are on the battle ground already Just an observation. Anyways, No one is heating up here lol. Learn how to comprehend to some of the replies if you were posting in suggestion and feedback. We are all just giving/sharing our opinion in a [b]calm status[/b] about this suggestion and not the other way around. If there's someone out there who treats this thread as a battle ground lol, then better stay away from this topic. Thanks

[quote=As cicatrizes]actually i think the main reason why this would not be implemented is that it could break rule no. 4[/quote] iap. that is the main reason. and that rule is valid for the whole forum. i don't see an exception. [quote=As cicatrizes]coz if its freedom board,basically, u dont have restraints.,wkokokk~u can critique mods and dis forum without any sanction., now.,dat would be a big problem in da future.,lol.,chaos.dats all i can say. wkokokk~~[/quote] actually bel, there is no rule that forbid us to give any strictures. but it should be delivered in a proper way. since we all here are human, which have feeling.

one really big disadvantage, i believe, about this "freedom board" is it might soon become the "[b]chaos[/b] board"..not sure & i won't justify. Then again, equality is one step closer to perfection... if you know what i mean. Anyway, there are good suggestions such that policies must still be applied. who knows, this might make ftalk much more busier. I'll stay neutral on the topic, good concept though.

[quote=mama0114]I think if this will be implemented it can be in private status that only legitimate members here can only view the thread like in e-groups or something like posts requirements like what is implemented in invisible status[/quote] That maybe an alternative to a "Freedom Board" if someone starts an egroup open to all members of the forum where they can express their opinions. Then the group owner can establish his/her rules and moderate it

[quote=dondon]But as i observed in the last post of the threadstarter, i was dissapointed. She is just viewing whats happening here, and just posting some kind of useless post and not sharing her idea to implement her own suggestion. Hope you get my point my friend, don't take it personally [/quote] wow u r disappointed .. why? want me to react to every mssg here ..? if i want to observe and weigh thing first i shud wait ryt and see and hear others opinion rather than babbling at once.. and besides... the topic is getting hotter... we need to apply some ice breaker... does saying i find sense with wat i quote shows if im serious or reflect how useless am i? if i was able to quote it out.. it only means im reading each and everyone opinion.. to all dont be afraid to any possibility if it will going to be a flaming ground or wat... each of us.. who replied here only shows how and who we value most the forum .. co forumer ... we wont know the out come but we can make plans to avoid any nega result wat we uttering only show our inside... point here is... we will never know not unless we try life is gamble.. risk is part of our everyday life.. we can do it if we will start to act and think in positive way...

Last edited by switpotato (2008-12-20 20:56:15)

[quote=switpotato]wow u r disappointed .. why?[/quote] want to know why i said that? here's your message (#24): [quote=switpotato]like this one lol.. make sense ...[/quote] can i ask, what is the purpose of that? your reading the whole thread and thats the only message you will post? [quote=switpotato]want me to react to every mssg here ..?[/quote] lol. did i say you must react all the post here? i just said, you must share your idea to implement your own suggestion. (post #33) Just a tip, post it with sense. your responsible to your thread if you want this to be implement

Since when this thread has become so off topic? please stay to the topic guyz. [hr] I'm trying to be neutral here, and like sir ephe said. [quote=Ephemeral]Does adding the said section or separate forum contribute or connect to the general purpose of FriendsterTalk?[/quote] the [b]flamming[/b] thing is really worrying, since you see, in this forum it self, with the rule of no flamming, people still flamme, what do you think will happen in this [i]freedom[/i] board? It will be on fire. If this idea is finally applied, I will go with the [b]responsible freedom[/b]. Well, I never take things personally, and I don't want anyone does too. Still, I like the idea of making the members to speak their minds.

[quote=Ephemeral]I still wonder who are the moderators who is willing to moderate that suggestion section /forum though... To be frank, I was thinking if they would be very brave or very stupid. Why? Read the explanation below properly... It makes you wonder right...? Why was this forum was called FriendsterTalk? Here's the answer... Generally, FriendsterTalk was created as an alternative to http://friendster-tweakers.com that serves as a resource for tweaking and general Friendster editing. Friendstertalk already has quite a lot of sections that is outside the category of Friendster tweaking. Does adding the said section or separate forum contribute or connect to the general purpose of FriendsterTalk? If so... Can you give an example or better yet examples why it can be applicable? Let me ask this general question to moderators and admins of their own forum. Do you want/have a section that gives a negative feel around your forum. Do you want a moderate a ticking time bomb? If you have threads or forums that relates to the suggested thread; please do post the link here and kindly explain how it helps your forum that focuses not on freedom but, tweaking, editing or others in general. To those who agree... If this suggestion was to be approved. I suggest apply as a moderator here and I suggest moderate that section alone. Why that section alone? As I said before... Do you want a moderate a ticking time bomb? You will need the concentration and effort. My conclusion to this is... If you guys want a Freedom forum. Just create one yourself and make negative and anti-topics regarding certain people you abhor, despise, hate, or loathe. Also, if it's moderated. Where's the freedom in that? There was supposed to be a line here... But I don't feel like posting it anymore.[/quote] yes this is true, FriendsterTalk talks about tweaking friendster we all know that, I think time by time we are loosing the point of these forum, we had many sections not including FriendsterTalk, it's really hard to explain what's happening, but right now we should know it, I know Sir Ephermal was right, he already said that we could just create a new forum, but it was just common sense to all of us what does [b]FriendsterTalk[/b] really mean not literally but figuratively just a simple life where we all met, had fun, and talk about what we want, I see that we're loosing the point of FriendsterTalk, but what FriendsterTalk right now is what make it grow, make it more active, more unique. @topic I agree, but we must had rules over there too ut just simple rule.

Last edited by tap13 (2008-12-20 23:15:50)