Pages: 12

I still think its more of a Microsoft V PS3. They more or less have the same capabilities.
I made my point.! Hahahahha
I still think its more of a Microsoft V PS3. They more or less have the same capabilities.
I made my point.! Hahahahha[/quote]
hahaha, Nintendo wasn't trying to be like the two of them because they didn't want to be in the competition, but Sony did something to Nintendo that's why Nintendo is now on the competition, i agree that it's a microsoft vs Sony at least at first it was Microsoft and Sony, but look at Microsoft now, they already lost, and now they're trying to regain what they lost by making another xbox, but will it work? not everybody got excited to hear an xbox 360 coming out, it was almost like they were trying to get there hands on "graphics that can bleed your eyes out of pure beauty" or the "the less graphics but a really interactive and fun way" console...
[Nintendo's new console ships with Wii Sports, which effectively demonstrates a new breed of games only possible on Wii. The Zelda franchise is equally exclusive to the machine and Twilight Princess is must-see, must-play and must-own entry into the series that proves over and over again why Nintendo is the best developer in the world.]
oh yeah, where do you play your ps3? it will really be a shame if you're just playing it in a small tv, go for the wide screen dude!!
Last edited by strikerno14 (2009-01-26 00:07:22)
Last edited by floid0523 (2009-01-26 11:45:06)
Last edited by strikerno14 (2009-01-23 11:40:10)[/quote]
No offense, but the the title is kinda provocative. It invites flame...
Anyway, on my personal view. I never compared Sony with Nintendo, because their perspectives and targets are totally different.
I am a addict gamer believe it or not. I play most consoles, especially PlayStation 2 or 3, most of my saves are 200 hours per game, because I am a perfectionist especially in RPG games, I play Nintendo to have fun with Friends. It's more entertaining. But my point is...
Sony primarily targets RPG games/Hack and Slash/PVP. While Nintendo is more into games with activities involving family, kid friendliness and adventure (A Good Example is WII and Gameboy Advance, mainly Pokemon and Kingdom Hearts *Commonly played games).
[b]As I said... Their perspectives and targets are totally different.[/b]
So comparing the two is kinda a down slump and cliche. There was no comparison to begin with.
But the funny thing is... I never can imagine GoW, GTA, FF Series, WSJ on a Nintendo Console, while Pokemon on PlayStation (I think there are Pokemon series on PS2 or PSP but not as entertaining as on Nintendo). I think the franchising controls Sony and Nintendo... Maybe it's just me.
No game makers - No games - Company bankrupts.
Last edited by Ephemeral (2009-01-26 12:14:56)
[b]No game makers[/b] - No games - Company bankrupts.[/quote]
So basically, all of them suck. [b]If [/b] there isn't any game makers and franchise supporters. I think the one with the larger $$ wins right?
(Off-Topic)
I like TheWorldEndsWithYou on NDS also FF games on PS2/3 (XIII rocks
). In short, both are Square-Enix.
Last edited by Ephemeral (2009-01-26 20:57:47)
No game makers - No games - Company bankrupts.[/quote]
i really didn't understand what this meant..sorry..
off topic..[quote=Ephemeral]I like TheWorldEndsWithYou on NDS also FF games on PS2/3 (XIII rocks
). In short, both are Square-Enix.
[/quote]
you play the world ends with you?
i never defeated the last boss, i mean, it was so &#%!&^! DIFFICULT!!!
i don't know the ending, and i need help..pls?..(pls don't spoil)
(do you think i should change the title?)
Last edited by strikerno14 (2009-01-26 22:47:58)
Last edited by Frazen (2009-01-27 01:30:50)