FTalk

Welcome guest! Please Log in or Register.

Post reply

ARCHIVES
» GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

Pages: 1..1 2 3 456 7 8 9..9

GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#81 2008-05-14 08:17:42

_*17*_: » FTalkAddict; 537; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

for me it's quite good! ahahahaha!

Like |
Dislike

#82 2008-05-15 04:06:06

yna_16: » FTalkGeek; 1413; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

sucks! shit

Like |
Dislike

#83 2008-05-15 06:40:48

jeidern: » n00b; 1; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

help me.. why are my pictures not showing up? is something wrong with fs?

Like |
Dislike

#84 2008-05-15 06:42:04

yEnyiE: » FTalkWhiz; 2696; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

good.! ahahaha

Like |
Dislike

#85 2008-05-23 11:45:58

peachy1111: » FTalker; 117; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

[color=pink]

yah it looks gud i like it[/color]

Like |
Dislike

#86 2008-05-25 01:09:51

senti06: » FTalkAddict; 564; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

[i]i thinks it's ok.

[/i]

Like |
Dislike

#87 2008-05-25 11:12:02

reikazek: » FTalkElite; 3782; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

well for me.. its ok.. i can now organize my photos

Like |
Dislike

#88 2008-05-29 01:04:03

dollface02: » FTalker; 113; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

Well, it doesn`t bother me.. I like organizing my photos. but, I don`t like the way it looks..

Like |
Dislike

#89 2008-05-29 09:11:37

kRz10: » FTalker; 217; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

For me,. I think it is Good.. because it can separate our pics.. and it could be better to rename those albums.

Like |
Dislike

#90 2008-05-29 20:31:20

CoWoCuPu: » FTalkElite; 4881; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

it suks......... wuts da points of dat?!

Like |
Dislike

#91 2008-06-14 08:22:42

nia_pearl19: » FTalkWhiz; 2529; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

I like it cause you ur friends will not be hard up viewing ur pix.....

Like |
Dislike

#92 2008-06-15 04:53:38

toshiyaDEG: » FTalkAddict; 430; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

it really helps . . because you can organize your pics . . dpnds on the occasions . .

Like |
Dislike

#93 2008-06-15 09:25:15

gengskie: » FTalkElite; 5947; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

for me it's good i can assort my pics.

Like |
Dislike

#94 2008-06-17 09:31:29

irafrancisca: » n00b; 50; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

if you have a lot, why not but if you just have 4 photos or less.. it's a no-no...

Like |
Dislike

#95 2008-06-17 15:54:16

Infamous J: » FTalkElite; 6844; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

it doesn't really bother me or affect me, but i don't like the new style as much oh well s*** happens

Like |
Dislike

#96 2008-06-18 10:07:55

jheneko: » FTalkGeek; 1484; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

for me its good because it separates my real photos from anime pix.. hehhee

Like |
Dislike

#97 2008-06-21 11:32:01

yumi43ღ: » FTalkAddict; 469; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

nice. because there`s categories. [color=#ff6699]♥[/color]

Like |
Dislike

#98 2008-06-26 13:27:46

cheuw: » SuperFTalker; 7763; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

nice bcause we can manage that

Like |
Dislike

#99 2008-06-28 02:07:34

LiLbLuEaNgEl: » FTalkAddict; 502; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

its good cuz i can finally organize my pics....

Like |
Dislike

#100 2008-06-28 07:03:04

Jarielle: » FTalker; 246; 0; 1969-12-31

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

hmm.. It's actually good because it helps you organize your pics.. [b]If you dont like the way it looks at your profile, well hide it. Simple solution.[/b]

Like |
Dislike

FTalk

GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#81 2008-05-14 08:17:42

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#82 2008-05-15 04:06:06

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#83 2008-05-15 06:40:48

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#84 2008-05-15 06:42:04

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#85 2008-05-23 11:45:58

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#86 2008-05-25 01:09:51

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#87 2008-05-25 11:12:02

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#88 2008-05-29 01:04:03

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#89 2008-05-29 09:11:37

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#90 2008-05-29 20:31:20

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#91 2008-06-14 08:22:42

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#92 2008-06-15 04:53:38

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#93 2008-06-15 09:25:15

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#94 2008-06-17 09:31:29

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#95 2008-06-17 15:54:16

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#96 2008-06-18 10:07:55

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#97 2008-06-21 11:32:01

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#98 2008-06-26 13:27:46

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#99 2008-06-28 02:07:34

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

#100 2008-06-28 07:03:04

Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.

Board footer