- ARCHIVES
- » GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
#161 2008-11-06 21:13:51
#162 2008-11-07 01:56:26
#163 2008-11-09 10:33:20
- shekinah.xoxo
- » FTalker
199
0
1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
More organize & it looks neat.
Last edited by shekinah.xoxo (2010-05-19 03:46:24)
 |
#164 2008-11-09 22:46:12
- raphael_marcos
- » Banned
- 750
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
good! it makes the profile more organize.
|
#165 2008-11-10 06:59:29
- xwiit_az_candii
- » FTalkWhiz
- 3364
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
[align=center][img]http://dl4.glitter-graphics.net/pub/814/814704cyboq51hjw.gif[/img]
[img]http://dl.glitter-graphics.net/pub/1009/1009301vx913s01dc.gif[/img] [b][color=deeppink]MY MESSAGE:[/color][/b] [img]http://dl10.glitter-graphics.net/pub/1009/1009300rsetro2tmi.gif[/img]
[b][color=pink]i lpve the *new* photo albums
in FS today...coz u can ut your desired
photos in the album you want..and it's
more organize and easy to find...[/color][/b]
[img]http://dl3.glitter-graphics.net/pub/677/677253fie8db2pvc.gif[/img]
[img]http://dl4.glitter-graphics.net/pub/814/814704cyboq51hjw.gif[/img][/align]
|
#166 2008-11-10 07:50:31
- _jeNny_
- » FTalker
- 210
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
its good for me because you can separate your pictures by yourself...
you can separate it by occasions and family album and also your personal album containing solo
pics!
|
#167 2008-11-18 22:56:17
- chipster489
- » FTalkWorm
- 16296
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
[b]Good 
, it does not suck. 
[/b]
, it does not suck. [/b]
|
#168 2008-11-23 22:19:43
- ximxim
- » FTalker
- 280
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
i prefer storing pix @ diff albums rathr than storing pixs @ only 1 set .
coz ,..
aside from it's organized, i think dat d pix(wen sorted) wud b easily viewd & identified by d viewers .
ryt, der r foto captions .,
but i mean , sorting pix n different ocaxons, events , color coding , etc .
|
#169 2008-11-24 06:12:05
- bunnykittie
- » FTalker
- 171
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
sucks!..it's bothering me...
|
#170 2008-12-06 02:47:26
#171 2008-12-07 02:11:12
- aLeckS14
- » FTalkManiac
- 844
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
Well I hate it beacauz when you want to upload pic...
It will take forever juz for the BROWSE FILES butoon to appear...
And yeah...Pretty much Like Multiply//
|
#172 2008-12-08 02:04:54
- bles_212000
- » FTalkWhiz
- 2863
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
For me it's much cooler than before, we can make lots of different albums regardless with the occasion.
In short their is a partition of the event in our life, and that's awesome. 
|