- ARCHIVES
- » GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
#101 2008-06-28 21:49:01
#102 2008-06-28 22:38:09
- jamia_mae
- » FTalkManiac
729
0
1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
i found them organize anyway... and for me, friendster is improving... 
but it's annoying sometimes... you'll be confused of where the particular photo you are looking for is... 
but it's annoying sometimes... you'll be confused of where the particular photo you are looking for is...
 |
#103 2008-06-29 01:18:14
#104 2008-06-29 02:11:12
#105 2008-06-30 06:02:13
- mango juice
- » FTalker
- 251
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
i like it.. but i hope its not only limited to 10...
|
#106 2008-06-30 16:38:28
#107 2008-07-18 11:20:29
- kr1st1an
- » FTalkManiac
- 860
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
i don't really care much about it.. hehe.. but i think its better to have it because you can organize your photos with it 
|
#108 2008-07-19 22:26:41
#109 2008-07-21 06:06:55
- KillerKhayzeeTM
- » FTalkManiac
- 716
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
great idea, kinda like myspace.
but having too much albums and photos suck.
i only have three albums, and 31 pictures. [a girl used to fake me, so i deleted everything.]
|
#110 2008-07-21 06:18:29
#111 2008-07-21 19:52:49
#112 2008-07-24 23:19:49
#113 2008-07-25 10:55:45
- purpletooth
- » FTalkManiac
- 861
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
[align=center][quote]i dont like it..
and i am wondering..
the thread starter.. how did he get banned?[/quote]
[/align]
|
#114 2008-07-28 21:05:08
#115 2008-07-29 08:16:54
- royalroa
- » FTalker
- 118
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
it's good but it's hard for people to find the new photos you updated. when i have updates i have to usually post a bulletin letting them know which album the new photos are in...
i would also like to see a "tag" option where you can start tagging people like on myspace and facebook!
|
#116 2008-07-29 17:53:32
#117 2008-07-29 20:17:48
- royalroa
- » FTalker
- 118
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
[quote=smoochey]I think Photo Albums sucks, I like the old one better.[/quote]
i disagree... organized photos with 20-30 photos in a categorized album are way better than 300+ random photos in one album
|
#118 2008-07-30 06:14:13
#119 2008-08-01 10:14:21
- deyminsane
- » n00b
- 21
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
[b]good coz i have many pictures 
[/b]
[/b]
|