- ARCHIVES
- » GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
- funmail
- » Banned
106
0
1969-12-31
GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
GOOD or SUCKS?
----------------------
I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
 |
- Shim Oo-Ma
- » FTalkWhiz
- 2548
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
totally!!!
i hate it..
it bothers my pretty profile
|
- lucknskill
- » FTalkAgent
- 2123
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
Hmmm.. i think it's good for those whose pics reach up from 100 to 1000.. so they can organize them.
no prob for me.
|
- campus_crashers
- » FTalker
- 196
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
photo albums is good and they can upload photos as much as they like..!!!
|
- john_619619
- » FTalkManiac
- 986
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
[b] about friedster NEW PHOTO ALBUMS... GOOD or SUCKS?[/b]
[b] 
Two Words 
[i]Suck It 
-D Generation X[/i][/b]
Two Words
[i]Suck It
-D Generation X[/i][/b]
|
- DeverKerbill
- » FTalkElite
- 5535
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
it doesnt matter for me...
no prob..
|
- Ephemeral
- » FTalkElite
- 4669
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
[quote=xavierkym]They're copying Multiply's Photo Album [/quote]
I agree. All that's missing is the tool tips. and viola. 
[/quote]
I agree. All that's missing is the tool tips. and viola.
|
- `mizeL
- » FTalkWhiz
- 3034
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
[quote=Ephemeral][quote=xavierkym]They're copying Multiply's Photo Album [/quote]
I agree. All that's missing is the tool tips. and viola. [/quote]
eehjhay also mentioned they were copying bebo.com's photo album style. a socializing network there in AU.
omg. friendster friendster....
but i don't care. it doesn't matter to me. 
[/quote]
I agree. All that's missing is the tool tips. and viola. [/quote]
eehjhay also mentioned they were copying bebo.com's photo album style. a socializing network there in AU.
omg. friendster friendster....
but i don't care. it doesn't matter to me.
|
- cutiegal
- » FTalkManiac
- 853
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
i like it because you can organize your photos..^yeah me too i agree.. i think they're copying multiply's style of organizing photos..actually it doesn't matter
|
- aRies04991
- » FTalkElite
- 4906
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
It's good for those with lots of photos, they can organize it... just like multiply.
|
- mlhannah
- » n00b
- 13
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
i don't like it. i HATE it. haha 
)
photos are STILL limited. you can only upload a total of 1000 photos.
not like before, you can have a total of 2000 [1000 public and 1000 private].
)
photos are STILL limited. you can only upload a total of 1000 photos.
not like before, you can have a total of 2000 [1000 public and 1000 private].
|
- lusanto_bluzone
- » n00b
- 66
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
[quote=xavierkym]They're copying Multiply's Photo Album [/quote]
Amen. Not to mention the survey that asks it users (myself included) if they are willing to pay more if they want to include JS for customizing their profiles.
here are the links:
[url]http://multiply.multiply.com/journal/item/216/Survey_Quick._Appreciated_Lots.[/url] (Article)
[url]http://multiply.com/info/survey/pro[/url] (Survey)
[/quote]
Amen. Not to mention the survey that asks it users (myself included) if they are willing to pay more if they want to include JS for customizing their profiles.
here are the links:
[url]http://multiply.multiply.com/journal/item/216/Survey_Quick._Appreciated_Lots.[/url] (Article)
[url]http://multiply.com/info/survey/pro[/url] (Survey)
|
- khrixty_017
- » FTalker
- 109
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
for me it good for those who wants to upload many photos...
and it annoys for those who have pretty prof..
|
- ---xXirukiTepe---
- » SuperFTalker
- 8896
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
its good, cos it can separate pics.
|