GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
You are viewing a post by lusanto_bluzone. View all 172 posts in GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is..
2008-02-24 08:42:53
- lusanto_bluzone
- » n00b
66
0
1969-12-31
GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is.
[quote=xavierkym]They're copying Multiply's Photo Album 
[/quote]
Amen. Not to mention the survey that asks it users (myself included) if they are willing to pay more if they want to include JS for customizing their profiles.
here are the links:
[url]http://multiply.multiply.com/journal/item/216/Survey_Quick._Appreciated_Lots.[/url] (Article)
[url]http://multiply.com/info/survey/pro[/url] (Survey)
[/quote]
Amen. Not to mention the survey that asks it users (myself included) if they are willing to pay more if they want to include JS for customizing their profiles.
here are the links:
[url]http://multiply.multiply.com/journal/item/216/Survey_Quick._Appreciated_Lots.[/url] (Article)
[url]http://multiply.com/info/survey/pro[/url] (Survey)
 |
You are viewing a post by lusanto_bluzone. View all 172 posts in GOOD or SUCKS? ---------------------- I WOULD SAY it doesnt look good for profiles, its better if it would be restored by the way it is..