[quote="kirksydney"]What's with reputations anyway? It doesn't measure your whole being and capacities, nor the respect you should be getting. So, why make a big fuss out of it? Just stating my opinion here, no offense to those people who are fond of reputations, especially those who are over reacting everytime they see a (-) sign on their control panel.[/quote] Yeh that's it[img]http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/7296/veryhappycs8.gif[/img] however other people [b]value[/b] their reputations that's why they will react everytime they will received -repu due to the reason was not valid. What will you fill if receive -repu without valid reason? It just like embarrassment isn't it!

tnx bro .. well it's still here .. [quote=darylldelfin]suggestion : the (-) sign on d repu .. (method=2) should be changed .. after clicked , before a member can give a nega repu to another member , it should be forwarded to d mods 1st . and mods will review d reason implied on what the nega repu was for .. and only mods can approve or disapprove the (-) change of reputations . this way , we can avoid members who abuse the reputation system .. well , it's just a suggestion though .. and i know that mods here already have big jobs .. niahaha . but i think this suggestion will add only a light work to them .. because nega repus only happen sometimes right ? and another suggestion , i wish mods can remove nega repus that has no valid reasons .. wakokokness .. [/quote] [quote=darylldelfin]so it should be like this : mods can remove nega repus (only to other members and not to his/herself and also ask other mods for approval .. ) [/quote] should i make another topic ?

@ ReversEdge: As a matter of fact, I already got [url=http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/9986/repumo9.png]one[/url]. That's the screenshot of the old reputation system. And as far as I remember, I didn't feel even a single sign of embarassment. Oh well, preferences vary from different people anyway. EDIT: Heck. I don't know how to quote a post. I'm lost.

Last edited by kirksydney (2008-07-25 02:50:55)

[quote=AFZULNIZAM]i like ur suggestion too but must up to 1500 post can give -ve repu..[/quote] I egree about that... someone can give negative repu must have more than 1500 post......

[quote=forsakendoll]why don't we just take off the whole (-) repu fxn since it's making everyone upset[/quote] that's also a good suggestion ..

[quote=forsakendoll]lol why don't we just take off the whole (-) repu fxn since it's making everyone upset </sarcasm>[/quote] ftw ate .. that made me laugh!! a stupid but nice suggestion.. you have a point

^ I ain't stereotyping, that's why I said this: [quote]Oh well, preferences vary from different people anyway.[/quote] Now, let's stick with the topic. Chill.

^ what actions do you want? we curse or worst ban members that give negative repus with OBVIOUS useless reasons otherwise, negative repus is there to make a member realize they may have done "undesirable" acts, a matter of misunderstanding or miscommunication. the staff cannot do anything with someone giving negative repus who have "acceptable" reasons but to somehow reconcile them. We cannot erase repus since i believe that privilege was disabled before by admin coz some mods abused it.

^ I understand and agree with what you are saying ducheszv & Ephemeral now that I really think about The last thing most of us would want to see is for admin to remove the rep system all together because as members we can not get along and just roll with both the good and bad reps..in life we get negative remarks from others just being alive

Last edited by bobcbar (2008-07-30 19:45:50)

[quote=ReversEdge]Anyway, when those solutions implemented? Howcome there are still complains![/quote] of course.. there is always someone who'll complain coz still someone will click the the [img]http://theftalk.com/img/warn_minus.gif[/img] button. Some do not know about this discussion and only find this out when they have complains or if someone will receive negative repu. [quote=ReversEdge]Sorry for demanding such things, I'm just concern to those who are terribly affected with those people who received negative repu without valid reasons... I'm on side of weaker one...[/quote] we are not taking sides. were just stating that we do what we can if someone will be given negative repu. we [b]evaluate[/b] and then [b]do actions appropriate to the situation at hand[/b]. If a member is obviously abusing the negative repu, we curse or ban them. If someone will be given negative repu due to misunderstandings and misinterpretations like what happened before, we try our best to neutralize the reputation or reconcile them. Thats how far we can go. Again, we cannot erase negative reputations. Like what bobcbar said: [quote]in life we get negative remarks from others just being alive[/quote] i hope you got your answer.

Last edited by ducheszv (2008-08-01 09:43:20)