- ARCHIVES
- » I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
- zephyr14
- » FTalker
247
0
1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
i saw a member who has two siggies..
her username is
[b]leojennyzi[/b]
sorry siz.. 
but you're breaking the rules.. 
but you're breaking the rules..
 |
- ReverzerO
- » FTalkAgent
- 2432
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[quote=sHy19]may i ask if text are also part of the "measurement"
like, if the image is already 200px in height.,
then ther r texts under or over it
then it exceeds the permittble height ryt?![/quote]
I think no!
|
- meng.o3
- » FTalkElite
- 4002
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
the measurement pertains to the image. as for the text, as long as it does not promote anger, flame or anything, it's fine
|
- karuro72002
- » FTalkWhiz
- 3325
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
^i hope Flaming Small Siggies are OK! 
|
- alliana01
- » FTalkGeek
- 1055
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[quote]10. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image height for signature is 200px. No audio or video allowed. We have the right to edit or remove objectionable signature.[/quote]
does this mean we dont have a limit when it comes to width?
|
- neaz
- » FTalkFreak
- 1996
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
i saw a member using a over sized siggy
[b] xoxoannah[/b]
sorry,,
[b] xoxoannah[/b]
sorry,,
|
- --pUshnIt08--
- » FTalkAgent
- 2003
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[quote]10. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image height for signature is 200px. No audio or video allowed. We have the right to edit or remove objectionable signature.[/quote]
[b]im really not sure if that rule is really being followed here,, ive seen members who uses 2 siggies..they do is they decrease the size of their siggies so it wuld still be in the 200px limit..but still they use 2 siggy!
ive seen one member:
Xian
i just saw his siggy, it was 2 siggies (small sizes so it wuld still fit in the 200px limit), i guess its not oversized but still i think his violating the rules by havin 2 siggies..am i wrong?
ive also seen members havin oversized siggies..sometimes i wuld tell them that their siggy is oversied when i post replies on the thread..
but stil i think rule10 is not followed that much compared to the other rules..[/b]
Xian
i just saw his siggy, it was 2 siggies (small sizes so it wuld still fit in the 200px limit), i guess its not oversized but still i think his violating the rules by havin 2 siggies..am i wrong?
ive also seen members havin oversized siggies..sometimes i wuld tell them that their siggy is oversied when i post replies on the thread..
but stil i think rule10 is not followed that much compared to the other rules..[/b]
|
- Ephemeral
- » FTalkElite
- 4669
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
2 signatures are fine just as long the don't accumulate to 200px in height.
example
130px + 50px = 180 still ok
150+ 140 = remove of seen.
|
- bobcbar
- » FTalkElite
- 5223
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
I have found that most users will adjust their oversized siggy if you just send them a pm and be polite in reminding them of the 200px height limit.
|
- neaz
- » FTalkFreak
- 1996
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[align=center][color=#cc0099]i saw a member using oversized siggy[/color]
[color=#cc0099]08n@miN308[/color]
[color=#cc0099]sorry[/color][/align]
[color=#cc0099]08n@miN308[/color]
[color=#cc0099]sorry[/color][/align]
|
- --pUshnIt08--
- » FTalkAgent
- 2003
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
@Ephe
oh ok..thanks for clearing that up!..,
@bobcar
ill just try to pm them when i see one than tell them publicly..sorry sir!.., but, am i allowed to do that?
,
@bobcar
ill just try to pm them when i see one than tell them publicly..sorry sir!.., but, am i allowed to do that?
|
- alliana01
- » FTalkGeek
- 1055
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
Kuya ephe can u answer my question pls?
[quote=alliana01][quote]10. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image height for signature is 200px. No audio or video allowed. We have the right to edit or remove objectionable signature.[/quote]
does this mean we dont have a limit when it comes to width?[/quote]
i just wanna know coz i was thinking of making my sigs 400x150
thnx po 
|
- ♥LoLLiPOPS♥
- » n00b
- 33
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
oh okay, that make sense.. :cloud: 
|
- TrendyMocha
- » Banned
- 230
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[b][color=deeppink]so that means no banners allowed?!? noo... 
[/color][/b]
[/color][/b]
|
- harvii
- » FTalkAgent
- 2063
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
^ Yes no [b]BANNERS[/b] allowed.
Only [b]A BANNER[/b]
|
- TrendyMocha
- » Banned
- 230
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[b][color=deeppink]god, spammers go to hell, you can spam there whenever you like to you dear friend devils.. here`s one -> 
[/color][/b]
[/color][/b]
|
- Trixx.xii
- » FTalkElite
- 3524
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[color=deeppink] they must be punished..! 
[/color]
[/color]
|
- TrendyMocha
- » Banned
- 230
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[b][color=deeppink]ephe is dissapointed 
[/color][/b]
[/color][/b]
|
- emotive_
- » FTalker
- 274
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
banners (with "s") are irritating. really! this is good for members who doesn't follow rules.
too bad, i've seen some members having those, "banners" but haven't got their names `coz i thought those signatures were just fine.
i'll tell you mods if ive located some. 
i'll tell you mods if ive located some.
|