- ARCHIVES
- » I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
#141 2008-03-26 18:08:42
- eehjhay
- » FTalkWhiz
2692
0
1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[quote=scott159]yeah ur rite...
keep it creative man...
[/quote]
What are you doing? Are you trying to increase your posts by repeating other people's ideas/posts?
[/quote]
What are you doing? Are you trying to increase your posts by repeating other people's ideas/posts?
 |
#142 2008-03-27 11:32:37
- beyondeknowledge
- » n00b
- 32
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
yeah eehjhay...
let's kick him out...
|
#143 2008-03-28 04:40:07
- judajammers
- » FTalkAddict
- 375
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
kicking is not the right solution for this if the moderator would have no choice. haha. [i]Im sorry![/i]
Well, I guess I have to say something that comes from me. haha.
[b]COOL POTING![/b]
[b]COOL POTING![/b]
|
#144 2008-03-28 19:38:55
- kristina16
- » SuperFTalker
- 9156
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[quote=cklahrckiey]some members here are having signature's that's too offensive
like the fowl words...
wish you could've seen that... 
[/quote]
yeah i ve seen one sig with the f word... though he is only using one sig... forgot his name but i saw him in friendster graphics... i think he's still using the same sig...
ill just look for him again...
[/quote]
yeah i ve seen one sig with the f word... though he is only using one sig... forgot his name but i saw him in friendster graphics... i think he's still using the same sig...
ill just look for him again...
Last edited by kristina16 (2008-03-28 19:39:10)
|
#145 2008-03-29 02:42:53
#146 2008-03-30 07:01:14
- Lryuzaki28
- » FTalker
- 122
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[b] [color=hotpink] [i] Oh! nc thread i will hunt some! [/i] [/color] [/b]
[/i] [/color] [/b]
|
#147 2008-03-30 23:16:22
- judajammers
- » FTalkAddict
- 375
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
look for someone. haha.
|
#148 2008-04-01 01:02:19
- kimyasay10
- » FTalkElite
- 4218
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
^_^
Hi Mods I Have Seen This
[url]http://theftalk.com/profile.php?id=68531[/url] << Click The url. 
OverSize Siggy! :idea:
OverSize Siggy! :idea:
|
#149 2008-04-04 09:10:10
- u_dont_matter_anymore
- » FTalkGeek
- 1206
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[color=#FF0000][b]i saw someone with a huge siggy... i saw her in lunareighn_sassy's request thread... [/b][/color]
|
#150 2008-04-05 01:46:19
- purpletooth
- » FTalkManiac
- 861
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
my signature has been removed before,, 
Last edited by purpletooth (2008-04-05 01:48:18)
|
#151 2008-04-07 01:19:37
- dheetiij's
- » FTalkGeek
- 1019
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
Report - Report - Report - Report
all you have to do guys is just click the report button...!
|
#152 2008-04-07 02:01:14
- marra06
- » FTalkAddict
- 490
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
yeah. your right.
i saw some of the [u]users/members[/u] have 2 siggs..
----
|
#153 2008-04-07 02:10:46
- el_chinito03
- » FTalker
- 297
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
hey may pic size is 197x226 y did u remove it? dats kinda unfair 
Last edited by el_chinito03 (2008-04-07 02:13:44)
|
#154 2008-04-07 02:46:48
- eehjhay
- » FTalkWhiz
- 2692
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
[quote=el_chinito03]hey may pic size is 197x226 y did u remove it? dats kinda unfair [/quote]
width = 197 << right?
height = 226 << right?
Or can you post the link of your signature so I could check the dimensions of it
[/quote]
width = 197 << right?
height = 226 << right?
Or can you post the link of your signature so I could check the dimensions of it
|
#155 2008-04-07 02:52:36
- el_chinito03
- » FTalker
- 297
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
" title="" rel="nofollow">http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2hh0zea&s
|
#156 2008-04-07 03:10:40
- eehjhay
- » FTalkWhiz
- 2692
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
Can you please right click that image, then select Properties. Then tell us what is the height of that picture. Because I see that it has 226px height which is prohibited in our forum.
|
#157 2008-04-07 03:17:44
- el_chinito03
- » FTalker
- 297
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
ow... sorry 4 dat 
|
#158 2008-04-07 07:01:33
#159 2008-04-08 04:22:19
- khrixty_017
- » FTalker
- 109
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
guys i'll gonna hunt too..wait for it..
|
#160 2008-04-17 11:40:39
- judajammers
- » FTalkAddict
- 375
- 0
- 1969-12-31
Re: I was quite disappointed when I saw some signatures that disregarded rule number 10. [quote][b]10[/b]. Signatures. Don't use more than one banner. Don't make it excessive and annoying. Maximum image
actually that siggy is a big one. whaaaaaa. watch out. edit it now!
|